"News is the first rough draft of history."

The Voice of the College at Florham

"News is the first rough draft of history." - The Voice of the College at Florham

Review: ‘Iron Man 3’ good start to summer movie season

JON SCOTT
Staff Writer

It’s that time of the year again. School is winding down and kids are eagerly looking forward to summer vacation. More importantly, the summer movie season is once again upon us. As it has been since 2007, the summer movie season starts every first weekend of May with a superhero film.

This season, that film is “Iron Man 3,” the first film to kick off Marvel Studios’ “Phase Two” of their Cinematic Universe (after the culmination of “Phase One,” which was last summer’s box office smash “The Avengers”).

In “Iron Man 3,” we see how Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) is haunted by what happened during the Battle of New York that was depicted in “The Avengers.” Because of this, he can’t sleep and suffers from anxiety attacks. He also now spends his days in his workshop making Iron Man suits, which puts a strain on his relationship with Pepper Potts (Gwyneth Paltrow).

Despite how he is feeling, Stark must return to save the day once more when two new threats show up.
Continue reading

Review: ‘42,’ a baseball film

JON SCOTT
Staff Writer

I am a sucker for sports movies. Even though I go in knowing that, yes, it will be cheesy and possibly a bit overdramatic, I cannot help but get sucked into the atmosphere of the film and root like crazy during the final game.

One of my favorite types of sports movies are baseball movies. I love to watch baseball so I enjoy films like “Field of Dreams” and “The Rookie.”

When I heard they were making a biopic on Jackie Robinson, one of the greatest baseball players of all time, I was immediately intrigued.
Continue reading

Review: ‘Jack the Giant Slayer,’ is an ‘all-right’ film, kids

JON SCOTT
Staff Writer

It seems that in Hollywood these days, making classic fairy tales into a darker and grittier tale full of special effects is all the rage. With “Alice in Wonderland” starting this trend back in 2010, we can’t go a year without a darker version of a classic fairy tale. In 2011, we saw the release of “Red Riding Hood” and in 2012 we saw the release of “Snow White and the Huntsman.” Now we have “Jack the Giant Slayer,” a darker version of “Jack and the Beanstalk.”
Continue reading

Review: Latest ‘Die Hard’ installment is dead on arrival

JON SCOTT
Staff Writer

Ever since I was young, one of my favorite film franchises has been the “Die Hard” franchise. I loved watching ordinary cop John McClane (Bruce Willis) trying to fight his way out of a situation that is beyond his control.

Many others, including myself, could fantasize that we would probably do the same thing in his situation. Now, Willis returns as John McClane in the fifth entry to the series, “A Good Day to Die Hard.”

Continue reading

Review: ‘Lincoln,’ latest film from Steven Spielberg

JONATHAN SCOTT
Staff Writer

It was a tough decision this weekend, movie-wise. Do I go see a movie about one of our greatest American presidents of all time, directed by one of the greatest filmmakers of our time… or do I go see the sparkly vampire movie? However, I could not bring myself to sit through the latter.

“Lincoln,” the latest film from legendary filmmaker Steven Spielberg, follows the president in the final months of his life. During this time period, we see his struggles: getting the Thirteenth Amendment passed to abolish slavery while trying to put an end to the Civil War to rebuild the United States once more.

I was curious to see what direction Spielberg would take with this film. He has been working on getting this film made since around 2005, when Liam Neeson was due to play Honest Abe. I was interested in seeing which aspect of Lincoln’s life Spielberg would depict.

After watching the film, I can say that while “Lincoln” is a good movie, it’s not the great movie I expected.
Continue reading

Review: ‘Argo’ is a ‘fantastic, well-made film

JONATHAN SCOTT
Staff Writer

It is rare when second chances are given to actors and actresses who have fallen far from the popular eye of movie-goers.
Take, for example, Ben Affleck.

Affleck used to be one of the biggest stars on the planet, but then in 2001, his career went into a tailspin with the release of “Pearl Harbor.”

It then spiraled even further out of control with 2003’s “Gigli,” bombing incredibly at the box office.

His career plunge also occurred at the same time as “Bennifer,” the much publicized relationship between Affleck and Jennifer Lopez.
But in 2007, Affleck managed to do the impossible: he started to re-invent his career.
Continue reading

Hopes for ‘Revolution’ as an overarching TV series

JONATHAN SCOTT
Staff Writer

I love watching television. Next to films, television is one of my favorite pastimes.

While many like watching crime procedurals like “NCIS” or “Law and Order,” my guilty pleasures are shows that have a huge, overarching question answered by asking smaller tiny questions.

A prime example of the show that started this trend is “Lost,” a show about a group of people that were stranded on a mysterious island.
The big question asked was, “what is the island?” After “Lost” ended, many shows tried to recreate the suspenseful build-up of answering a looming question by piquing the audience’s curiosity week after week.

Some of these shows had a lot of potential but usually have been cancelled after a single season. The newest show in this overarching mythology trend is “Revolution,” airing Mondays at 10 p.m. on NBC.

“Revolution” introduces us to a world where, 15 years prior, the entire world’s electricity was suddenly shut off. Nothing worked and soon, the government fell.
Continue reading

Review: ‘Looper’ is a fun time for viewers

JONATHAN SCOTT
Contributor

It is rare to find originality in Hollywood these days. Whenever a big-budget blockbuster comes out, it is usually based off of a board game or action figures, a sequel to a popular movie, a prequel to a popular movie or an adaptation of a book, video game, etc.

So whenever that one film that is original and stands on its own comes around, most will find it to be a breath of fresh air.

We hope for it to be a movie that sets up its world well and is a fun time to watch. Luckily, “Looper” is such a film.

The film takes place in the future, in the year 2044. More than 30 years from now, time travel will become outlawed and the only ones who will have control of it are huge crime syndicates.

Their targets are hunted down and sent back to the year 2044, where they’re killed on the spot by “loopers,” assassins paid to kill these targets. One of these loopers is Joe (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), who is one of the best loopers out there, never letting a target escape, a requirement mandated by his employer.

One day, when his next target shows up in front of him and he is about to kill him, he is shocked to discover that his future self (Bruce Willis) is the next target. Joe hesitates, allowing his future self to gain the upper hand and escape. Now Joe must go on the run from his employers all while trying to hunt down his future self.

In an original film such as “Looper,” the audience wants to be intrigued and be able to dive right into the world in front of them. They expect to be entertained. “Looper” delivers on all of these promises.

Not only is this one of the most original films I have seen in years but it is also one of the best films of the year so far, hands down.
The performances in this movie were fantastic. Gordon-Levitt keeps on proving why he is becoming one of Hollywood’s hottest stars. He is fantastic in this movie, managing to make his character so cold and heartless when it comes to killing the target, showing no remorse for killing them.

Even when he has to hunt down his future self, he is still relentless in tracking down his target. During the making of this movie, they used prosthetics on Gordon-Levitt’s face to make him look a little bit more like Bruce Willis.

Not only does he look like a young Bruce Willis, but Gordon-Levitt perfects so many of Willis’ mannerisms and facial expressions. It is literally like watching Willis when he was in his 20s.

And speaking of Willis, it was great to see him in a really good action movie once again. It was fascinating to see him play the same character as Gordon-Levitt, yet make him an entirely different man, one who is tortured by what will happen in the future and how he will do whatever he can to prevent his future from happening.

The supporting cast members also give strong performances. Jeff Daniels gives a nice turn as Joe’s boss from the future. The biggest standouts of the film are Emily Blunt and Pierce Gagnon, who play Sara and Cid, a mother and her son who Joe meets while looking for his future self. Blunt is excellent here making her character wary and vulnerable considering it is just her and her son.

And as for Gagnon … I am not the biggest fan of child actors in movies. For me, they will end up either being pretty good like Hailee Steinfeld in 2010’s “True Grit” or really bad like the kid who played young Anakin Skywalker in “Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace.”

But surprisingly, Gagnon is an absolute revelation in this movie. I have never seen a child actor give a performance this strong. I hope we see more of him in the future.

Another thing that I loved about this movie was how this world was introduced and how the story was played out.

The film is written and directed by Rian Johnson, a director who has made a few underrated movies, such as 2005’s “Brick.” In “Looper,” Johnson manages to cleverly and seamlessly set up this world without delving into too much backstory.

Even though the idea of “man meeting his future self” has been done before, Johnson manages to put a fresh new spin on this idea.
Also, Johnson has an interesting visual directing style, setting up interesting camera angles and having beautiful cinematography.

An example of one of these interesting camera angles is when young Joe falls off the ladder of an apartment building and as he falls, the camera moves sideways and follows him as he falls.

The majority of the movie was shot in Louisiana so you have beautiful shots of the open landscape. Johnson also knows how to shoot action scenes well without utilizing the shaky cam technique so you can actually see what is happening.

It’s artfully done well. And speaking of the action scenes, the action in this movie is some of the best action I have seen put on film so far this year.

There are a few minor problems I had with the film. While I did say that I praised the film for its originality, some of the time travel talk in this just messes with your brain a bit and, on occasion, is a bit difficult to follow.

Also, the ending of the film (without giving it away and getting myself into trouble) will cause mixed reviews.

Personally, I did not mind the ending but I can see how some people might be rather divided on it.

Overall, “Looper” is a smart, original film. It met all the expectations I had going into it and is one of the best films of the year.
Grade: A-

Review: ‘Resident Evil: Retribution,’ so bad it’s good

JONATHAN SCOTT
Contributor

Everyone has their guilty pleasures when it comes to movies. Whether it is a stupid comedy or a big, dumb, loud action movie, many love a film that many others might hate.

For me, one of those guilty pleasures is the “Resident Evil” film series.

The films, loosely based off of the Capcom video games, follow Alice (Milla Jovovich), a young woman who fights against legions of the undead who caused a virus to be accidentally unleashed by the Umbrella Corporation.

In this latest installment, “Resident Evil: Retribution,” the film picks up immediately where the last one, “Resident Evil: Afterlife,” left off. Alice has been captured by the Umbrella Corporation and is trapped in the Arctic Circle base.

She soon breaks out of captivity with the help of a group of rebel freedom human fighters, led by Leon S. Kennedy, a fan favorite from the video games.

Now, Alice must fight her way out of the base all while avoiding former friend, Jill Valentine (Sienna Guillory), her team of clone soldiers, and of course, legions of monsters and the undead.

With the “Resident Evil” films, I am usually pretty lenient and open-minded because I know what I’m getting into. When going into a “Resident Evil” movie, you have to keep a few things in mind.

One is to keep the movies and the games separate. Now, I may not play the “Resident Evil” games often, but I do know that the movies and the games are nothing alike save for a few characters (Leon S. Kennedy, Jill Valentine, and Albert Wesker) and a few monsters (the giant monster with the huge ax from “Resident Evil 5”).

Other than that, the stories in the movies have nothing to do with the stories in the games.

The second thing one must realize going into a “Resident Evil” film is that the movie is not going to be an Oscar-winning film.

If you go into this movie thinking that you will be seeing a film with gripping performances, beautiful scenery and camera shots and heart-stopping action….leave the theater immediately and go watch a different movie because you will not find it here.

All you will find is a film where you can turn your brain off while you watch people fight the undead.
Though the acting in this movie is pretty terrible, it is entertaining to watch.

The only one who does any actual decent acting is Jovovich, returning in her signature role as Alice. Jovovich doesn’t show any major acting chops but she does spew some funny one liners.

At one point, she has to protect this young little girl who believes Alice to be her mother. Here, Jovovich shows a softer, motherly side.

It is a nice change to see a different side of this character rather than the whole “I shoot people with a gun and do crazy martial arts” aspect of her.

Though Kevin Durand (“Lost,” “X-Men Origins: Wolverine,” “Wild Hogs”), did not have a lot of screen time, it was a ton of fun to watch him as Barry Burton, another character from the games.

It was also entertaining to see Michelle Rodriguez, Oded Fehr and Colm Meaney return in their roles as Rain Ocampo, Carlos Oliveira and James Shade, all of whom have appeared in previous films.

Also, the action in this film was well done. The director, Paul W.S. Anderson, is a visual director and generally directs action scenes well.

His trademark is his use of slow motion but surprisingly, there wasn’t a lot of it in this film. Not all of the action scenes were spectacular, but kept me interested enough.

One of the film’s biggest problems is Guillory as Jill Valentine. She was absolutely horrendous in this movie. Her character is just emotionless.

The way Guillory speaks her dialogue…absolutely cringe-worthy.

She is by far the worst actress in the entire movie. The other major problem I have with this movie is the ending.

I will not spoil the ending of the film with details because I can’t – the movie just ends. The ending was sudden and felt rushed, though it did leave room for another film to be released.

Overall, is “Resident Evil: Retribution” a good movie? Absolutely not. Is it terrible? Yes, though it is one of those films that is so bad it’s good!

It is a movie where you can get together with your friends and just sit down, laugh, tear the movie apart and have a good time.

Grade: C