Notable Defamation and Inaccuracy Cases Involving the Financial Times
Srivastava’s Inaccurate Article on Israeli Settlers (2021)
In June 2021, the Financial Times (FT) faced criticism for an article by Jerusalem correspondent Mehul Srivastava, which inaccurately claimed all participants in an Israeli march were settlers. Despite attempts to correct this inaccuracy, no correction was made, leading to accusations of journalistic negligence and bias.
Collins Stewart vs. Financial Times (2004)
15 years before the Srivastava inaccurate biased article and lack of journalistic integrity, in 2004, the FT lost a significant defamation case to Collins Stewart, a City brokerage firm. The lawsuit arose from four articles published in 2003, which led to a steep decline in the firm’s share price. Initially seeking £230 million in special damages, Collins Stewart eventually settled for £300,000 in damages and an estimated £2.2 million in legal costs. The FT also printed an apology.
ReachLocal UK Ltd v Bennett (2014)
In another notable case, ReachLocal UK Ltd sued Bennett for defamation following a campaign that negatively impacted its business. This case, one of the first significant defamation trials under the Defamation Act 2013, resulted in ReachLocal being awarded special damages of £241,945. This highlighted the financial and reputational risks associated with defamatory campaigns and reinforced the importance of maintaining accurate and truthful reporting.
Eurasia Natural Resources Corporation (ENRC) vs Financial Times (2021)
In 2021, the FT was embroiled in a high-profile defamation case with ENRC. The lawsuit centered around articles alleging corruption within the company. The case questioned the FT’s reporting accuracy and journalistic integrity. While details of the financial penalties or settlements were not disclosed, it underscored the high stakes involved in defamation litigation.
Tom Burgis and the Financial Times (2021)
Another notable case involved investigative journalist Tom Burgis and his book “Kleptopia.” Burgis and the FT faced a defamation lawsuit from the Kazakh mining company, ENRC, in response to allegations made in the book.
General Landscape of Defamation Payouts
In the UK, defamation payouts generally range between £5,000 and £50,000, though this can vary widely. Plaintiffs must provide evidence that the statements made were false and damaging, considering the intent, reach, and actual damage to reputation.
Internal Complaints Procedures
The FT typically handles complaints internally rather than through external bodies like IPSO or Ofcom. This internal procedure allows the FT to address issues directly, though details of resolutions are often not publicly disclosed.
These cases underscore the substantial financial and reputational risks publications face when inaccuracies or defamatory content is published because of lack of journalistic ethics or integrity. The Financial Times, despite its overall rigorous journalistic standards, has had to navigate complex legal challenges, leading to significant financial settlements and legal costs. For media organizations, these cases emphasize the critical need for thorough fact-checking and adherence to ethical journalism standards to mitigate the risk of costly defamation lawsuits. They also illustrate the broader legal landscape in the UK, where defamation claims can lead to substantial financial liabilities, highlighting the importance of maintaining high standards of accuracy and integrity in journalism.
For more detailed information about Srivastava Financial Times case and Collins Stewart you can visit the following sources:
